Cübbeli Hoca Explains: Is Oral Sex Permissible in Islam?

Renowned Islamic scholar Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca has recently addressed a frequently asked and controversial question: “Is oral sex permissible in Islam?” His detailed explanation, rooted in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), highlights the differences between the various schools of thought (madhabs) and the importance of distinguishing between what is “haram” (forbidden) and what is simply “not permissible.”

“Declaring Something Haram is Not That Simple”

Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca began his explanation by emphasizing that calling something “haram” (forbidden) in Islam requires strong and clear evidence from the Qur’an and sahih hadiths (authentic sayings of the Prophet Muhammad):

“Look, calling something haram is a serious matter. If you say something is haram in the name of Allah, you must have strong evidence for it. The Qur’an says: ‘Do not say falsely, with your tongues, ‘This is lawful, and this is forbidden,’ to invent a lie against Allah.’ (Surah An-Nahl 116-117). Declaring something haram without clear proof is a major sin.”

He stressed that Islamic jurisprudence does not allow declaring something haram without clear textual evidence, and such a ruling cannot be based on personal opinions or societal norms.

Different Opinions Among Islamic Schools of Thought (Madhabs)

Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca then analyzed the issue according to the four major schools of Islamic thought: Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki, and Hanbali.

1. Hanafi School of Thought

In Hanafi jurisprudence, oral sex is considered “makruh” (discouraged or undesirable) but not strictly haram. This means that while it is not recommended, it does not fall into the category of a major sin.

“In the Hanafi school, the authoritative legal text ‘Fetâvâ-yı Hindiyye’ states: ‘It is said that there is no harm in it (“la be’sa bihi”).’ But another opinion says ‘It is not permissible (“la yajuz”).’ However, notice that no scholar explicitly states that it is haram.”

Cübbeli compared this ruling to the Islamic debate on smoking, saying:

“Look at cigarettes. Even though many scholars discourage smoking, they do not declare it haram because that would require strong evidence. The same applies here: we can say it is not permissible, but calling it haram is difficult.”

2. Shafi’i School of Thought

The Shafi’i school takes a more lenient approach on this issue, primarily because semen (maniy) is considered pure (tahir) rather than impure (najis).

“Shafi’i scholars argue that semen is not impure because, according to them, ‘All prophets were created from semen, so how can we call it impure?’ That is why they do not consider oral sex as problematic.”

According to this school of thought, since semen is considered clean, engaging in oral sex does not necessarily violate Islamic purity laws. However, other aspects such as intention, cleanliness, and modesty still play a role in determining whether it is encouraged or discouraged.

3. Maliki School of Thought

The Maliki school offers an even broader perspective. In many Maliki-majority regions such as Indonesia and Malaysia, religious scholars do not impose strict prohibitions on oral sex.

“In Maliki jurisprudence, there is significant leniency on this matter. In places like Indonesia and Malaysia, where Maliki and Shafi’i jurisprudence are dominant, even religious figures do not see this as a major issue because their schools of thought allow more flexibility.”

This means that in Maliki jurisprudence, there is no strong argument for oral sex being outright haram.

4. Hanbali School of Thought

Despite being the most strict school in many aspects of Islamic law, the Hanbali school does not explicitly declare oral sex haram. Instead, it discourages it based on concerns about cleanliness and modesty.

“Hanbali scholars emphasize purity and hygiene. While they do not declare oral sex haram, they consider it an undesirable act due to hygiene and decency concerns.”

Hygiene and Medical Concerns

In addition to religious discussions, Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca also addressed the health and hygiene risks associated with oral sex:

“What do doctors say? They warn that the mouth is one of the most bacteria-prone areas of the body. Now, think about it: you recite the Qur’an, you perform prayers—should this mouth be engaged in such acts? From a hygiene perspective alone, it is problematic.”

Cübbeli pointed out that Islam encourages cleanliness, and engaging in practices that increase the risk of infections or diseases should be avoided even if they are not explicitly haram.

“Taqwa is One Thing, Fatwa is Another”

One of the most important distinctions that Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca made was between “taqwa” (piety) and “fatwa” (Islamic legal ruling).

“Look, I am one of the strictest scholars on these matters, but even I cannot say it is haram. Why? Because a clear Qur’anic verse or hadith (nas) is required. But if you ask what is more virtuous and righteous (taqwa), then of course, it is better to avoid it.”

This means that while Islamic jurisprudence does not explicitly prohibit oral sex, those who want to practice a higher level of religious devotion might choose to avoid it out of personal piety.

Final Verdict: Is Oral Sex Haram or Permissible?

Based on Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca’s explanation, the Islamic perspective on oral sex varies across different schools of thought:

• In Hanafi jurisprudence: Oral sex is not haram but discouraged (makruh).
• In Shafi’i and Maliki jurisprudence: There is more leniency, and it is not considered impure or haram.
• In Hanbali jurisprudence: While not haram, it is discouraged due to cleanliness concerns.
• From a health perspective: It is not recommended due to hygiene and infection risks.
• From a spiritual perspective: It is best avoided for those seeking higher levels of piety (taqwa).

Conclusion: Everyone Must Decide Based on Their Own Beliefs

Ultimately, Cübbeli Ahmet Hoca emphasized that each person should follow their own Islamic understanding and their school of thought.

“This is not a topic that can be generalized for everyone. If you follow the Hanafi school, you should adhere to their rulings. If you follow the Shafi’i or Maliki school, you have more flexibility. But in any case, declaring something haram requires clear evidence, and there is no such evidence in this case.”

What Do You Think?

Now that you have read the different perspectives, which school of thought do you align with? Do you think this issue is clear-cut or open to interpretation? Share your thoughts!

Views: 0